Things have been relatively quiet on Nantucket this week with the Thanksgiving holiday. There’s plenty of time to stop and reflect upon the things for which we are thankful. And there are a lot of them. One only needs to take a walk on the quiet beaches or invite friends and family into one’s home to be filled with the gratitude of life 30 miles out to sea. At the same time, this article has been making the rounds on social media. It’s an essay that explains, in shocking and depressing tones, what a mess humanity has made of the planet and how our focus on climate change is something of a red herring. Throughout this piece, it is possible to substitute the word “Nantucket” for “The planet” and come to the same conclusions: our growth-addicted, two-legged species is spoiling things. Fortunately, on Nantucket, the natural beauty and viability of our resources are still intact, if not tentatively so. We believe that it is still possible to protect the things we are thankful for on this small island. Community. Nature. Quality of life. It will take a lot of collaboration and hard work. But, thankfully, hard work is one thing that Nantucketers are used to. Have a great Sunday. |
A difference that makes all the difference
One of the important distinctions between ACK•Now and other non-profits that the recent press coverage did not touch upon is a point key to the organization’s core beliefs — a difference that, for many, should make all the difference. We are a 501(c)(4) non-profit. And not a 501(c)(3). So, what does this mean? First, it means we are organized to primarily promote public and social benefits. A garden variety 501(c)(3) can be an arts organization that caters only to people who love Strindberg, a church of any denomination, a private social club like the Wharf Rats, or a charity that addresses a specific need. But a public welfare non-profit — a 501(c)(4) — has to be run for the benefit of the many. Some common examples of 501(c)(4) corporations include volunteer fire departments, Miss America and community service organizations like Rotary and Kiwanis clubs. Here’s the definition from the IRS.gov web site: To be tax-exempt as a social welfare organization described in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 501(c)(4), an organization must not be organized for profit and must be operated exclusively to promote social welfare. The word exclusively is important there. An organization like ACK•Now is not here to entertain the whims of a small group or focus on a pet project. We are organized to do good in a general sense for the general population of the island. Another thing about being a 501(c)(4): it means a donation made to ACK•Now is not tax-deductible. In other words, people who give to a 501(c)(4) do so because they believe in the mission and the work being done and are definitely not doing it because they want to lower their tax liability. And speaking of donations, as a 501(c)(4) we are obligated to file a form 990 with the IRS and disclose our donations. While some non-profits choose to redact the names of their donors, it is our policy to maintain full transparency and disclose the names of those who support us. We dislike the idea of dark money in politics as much as anyone. Given the restrictions of being a 501(c)(4), one might ask why we did not decide to be a plain old 501(c)(3) instead. The answer is, that 501(c)(3) groups are limited by the IRS in how they can participate in the political process. Being a 501(c)(4) means we are free to do the hard work necessary to make change happen. Like participate fully in town meetings and lobbying the statehouse. It means we can hire subject matter experts and legal counsel to push ideas forward. We can work with government. But we can also operate independently as long as we keep public benefit in mind. Sure, there are downsides to being a 501(c)(4). There’s extra reporting. Compliance can be more complicated. And it’s somewhat harder to fundraise. But, ultimately the benefits win out. It all comes down to this: Meaningful change cannot happen without political participation, and the 501(c)(4) designation allows us to participate as a political organization as long as no more than 50% of our income is spent to impact the political process. (The other 50% will be spent on things like research, knowledge base creation, team building, and public awareness projects.) We felt that the time for this idea is now. Hope you agree. Have a great week. |
How do cities and towns pay for transportation?
Let’s face it. Making improvements to transportation requires funding and lots of it. The Metropolitan Area Planning Council in Massachusetts has put together its 2019 report on ways for Massachusetts cities and towns to pay for transportation improvements. Not all of these 14 suggestions relate directly to Nantucket, but they may spark some creative problem-solving.
What can Nantucket Learn From Manhattan?
Nantucket and Manhattan are both small islands (Nantucket is 4 times bigger, believe it or not). And we have many of the same problems, but on a different scale, of course. Transportation is always an issue. Parking is never easy unless it is incredibly expensive. People have trouble finding affordable housing. And, perhaps most importantly, the trash and sewage issues are ones for which we need the best thinking and smart people working every day for the sake of our own health and that of the environment. Here’s a great episode of the podcast Here’s The Thing with Alec Baldwin called “Brilliant Minds of Trash and Sewage” that we can all learn from, even if we live on an island without a single skyscraper.